We Keep Hearing Both, So
We Tried To Figure Out Why.
On Monday, U.S. forces
stepped up a campaign of airstrikes in Iraq, targeting a fearsome
four-letter terrorist
organization that’s become synonymous with videotaped beheadings. It’s
all part of a military strategy that follows President Obama’s
recent pledge to “degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a
comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.”
But you might have wondered why the commander-in-chief
keeps referring to the organization as ISIL?
"The United States
strongly condemns the barbaric murder of UK citizen David Haines by the terrorist
group ISIL." pic.twitter.com/iscj8GSB5h
More to the point, is ISIL
the same as ISIS, which is what almost everyone else is calling the group? Good
question.
How It All Started
The idea for ISIS was hatched
more than two decades ago by Jordanian fighter and Sunni extremist Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi under the name Jama’at al-Tawhid
wal-Jihad, which was soon commonly referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. By 2004, he
had allied himself with Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda proper, targeting
coalition forces using IEDs, suicide bombers and hostage executions.
When Things Changed
After Al-Zarqawi’s
death in 2006 during a U.S. airstrike, new leader Abu Ayyub al-Masri renamed
the group the Islamic State of Iraq. When Masri was killed in 2010, Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi rose to power and changed the name once again in April 2013 to the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, a nod to the group’s
incursion into a new region: Syria. The “L”
is also, of course, what’s referred to in the term ISIL.
Why ISIS?
In Arabic, the group’s
name translates to Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya fi al Iraq wa al-Sham. (Al-Sham is a
reference to Syria.) That name alludes to the concept of a larger Islamic
state, or Caliphate, the group seeks to create, which would reach from Turkey
to Syria and Egypt
and include parts of Lebanon,
Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian territories.
Why Won’t The President Use The Name?
According to the UK’s
Independent, President Obama has been reluctant to use the phrase ISIS because
of the “S” that stands for
Syria and any talk of attacking the terrorists in that country would look odd
after the White House refused to send U.S. troops to help intervene in the
Syrian civil war.
So Why ISIL?
The term the president used
25 times in last week’s address refers to The Islamic State of Iraq and the
Levant, which refers to the larger caliphate that the terrorists are trying to
establish, making the threat seem that much more serious and widespread.
Does It Matter Which One You Use?
In the end, they mean the
same thing, according to Daniel Pipes, president of the Middle East Forum. “One
refers to a state, the other has an archaic ring,”
he wrote recently. “For reasons unknown to me, the executive branch of the
U.S. government adopted the ISIL nomenclature and its staff generally use this
term, even though members of Congress, the media, and specialists (including
me) generally prefer ISIS.”
No comments:
Post a Comment